I finally did it...
31 January 2007 01:24I saw Donnie Darko. If I had a dollar for every person who told me I should see it...
Anyhow, it was at The Enzian for $5 earlier this evening. I am tired so I don't have that much to say about it right now. I can say, however, that I no longer hate Gary Jules' version of "Mad World" anymore. I always thought it was overrated. I still like the original best, though I don't mind the slower pace...never did. Roland and Curt have even begun performing it slower when they play live, like Gary Jules' version. It was always the voice that bothered me. Too wavery and weak, I think. Maybe now I can say creepy? Haunting? I am glad I can be open-minded enough to judge the same song in different context, with different eyes, for a reinterpretation. I think it is wonderful what music can do.
Anyhow, it was at The Enzian for $5 earlier this evening. I am tired so I don't have that much to say about it right now. I can say, however, that I no longer hate Gary Jules' version of "Mad World" anymore. I always thought it was overrated. I still like the original best, though I don't mind the slower pace...never did. Roland and Curt have even begun performing it slower when they play live, like Gary Jules' version. It was always the voice that bothered me. Too wavery and weak, I think. Maybe now I can say creepy? Haunting? I am glad I can be open-minded enough to judge the same song in different context, with different eyes, for a reinterpretation. I think it is wonderful what music can do.
no subject
Date: 31 Jan 2007 06:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2007 02:14 (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2007 04:56 (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2007 05:01 (UTC)no subject
Date: 31 Jan 2007 06:48 (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2007 02:17 (UTC)no subject
Date: 31 Jan 2007 07:18 (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2007 02:43 (UTC)I generally liked the film, even if I did get a bit lost, which I know had some part to do with the lighting, but also because it was the original cut, which I have read since seeing it, leaves out some things that make the movie more understandable. Typically the Director's cut is the definitive version, but there is some debate with this film whether it ruins the mysteriousness of the film. I guess I will have to check out the DC on DVD sometime. I am not sure I was convinced that Drew Barrymore was a school teacher, though I was convinced that Patrick Swayze was a skeezy person. I like Gena Malone (loved her in Saved!) and I think she was fine here too. I liked the music naturally, though I felt it was a little unnatural in some places.
I really think that seeing it again with proper lighting will be good, and with the knowledge from the FAQs I saw last night on IMDB, I should be able to follow more closely and look for things that I was not able to catch with this first viewing.
no subject
Date: 31 Jan 2007 22:11 (UTC)(Oh and it's a different PL gal, so it should be a good show.)
no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2007 02:45 (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2007 04:54 (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2007 05:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Feb 2007 04:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Feb 2007 05:44 (UTC)Donnie Darko
Date: 19 Feb 2007 19:07 (UTC)I kept reading references to it and we rented it [director's cut version] a few years ago when it came out on DVD. It was interesting enough to watch but ultimately I thought "So what." I only found out after watching it just HOW big a cult had been formed around this movie and I didn't by a long shot find it that compelling. And for the record, I thought the "Mad World" cover was lame.
Re: Donnie Darko
Date: 19 Feb 2007 21:21 (UTC)Thanks for stopping by Jim. :)
Re: Donnie Darko
Date: 22 Feb 2007 13:22 (UTC)Re: Donnie Darko
Date: 23 Feb 2007 02:18 (UTC)Trip to LA was mostly good...a little drama, but still a higher percentage of good to bad. The get together with Ron at the Tattle Tale was great. What a skeezy old place that is. :P The Doctor Who con was great as always. :)